U.S. v. FERGUSON, 11-cr-306 (MJD/LIB). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20120111786
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 10, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2012
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. I. Introduction This matter is before the court on Defendant Chris Neil Ferguson's motions to bifurcate proceedings and to exclude Rule 404(b) evidence. [Docket No. 20.] Based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate Proceedings [Docket No. 20] is DENIED . 2. Defendant's motion to exclude evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) [Docket No. 20] is DENIED AS MOOT be
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. I. Introduction This matter is before the court on Defendant Chris Neil Ferguson's motions to bifurcate proceedings and to exclude Rule 404(b) evidence. [Docket No. 20.] Based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate Proceedings [Docket No. 20] is DENIED . 2. Defendant's motion to exclude evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) [Docket No. 20] is DENIED AS MOOT bec..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter is before the court on Defendant Chris Neil Ferguson's motions to bifurcate proceedings and to exclude Rule 404(b) evidence. [Docket No. 20.]
Based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion to Bifurcate Proceedings [Docket No. 20] is DENIED.
2. Defendant's motion to exclude evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b) [Docket No. 20] is DENIED AS MOOT because the Government has not moved to admit any such evidence.
Source: Leagle
