VLAMINCK v. ASTRUE, 10-4910 (MJD/FLN). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20120326952
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed January 25, 2012. Plaintiff Joshua Jon Vlaminck filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United Stat
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed January 25, 2012. Plaintiff Joshua Jon Vlaminck filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United State..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed January 25, 2012. Plaintiff Joshua Jon Vlaminck filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Noel filed January 25, 2012.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel filed January 25, 2012 [Docket No. 20].
2. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 10] is DENIED.
3. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 16] is GRANTED.
4. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
