PERKERSON v. ASTRUE, 11-CV-1709 (PJS/JJK). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20120807875
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Emmett Perkerson's objection to the June 1, 2012 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. Judge Keyes recommends granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and denying Perkerson's motion for summary judgment. The Court has conducted a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Based on that review, the Cou
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Emmett Perkerson's objection to the June 1, 2012 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. Judge Keyes recommends granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and denying Perkerson's motion for summary judgment. The Court has conducted a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Based on that review, the Cour..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Emmett Perkerson's objection to the June 1, 2012 Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes. Judge Keyes recommends granting the Commissioner's motion for summary judgment and denying Perkerson's motion for summary judgment. The Court has conducted a de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the R&R.
ORDER
Based on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court ADOPTS the R&R [Docket No. 17]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 8] is DENIED.
2. Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Docket No. 14] is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff's complaint [Docket No. 1] is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND ON THE MERITS.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
