HILL v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, 12-738 (MJD/AJB). (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20130319d52
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2013
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated December 26, 2012. [Docket No. 59] Plaintiff Melissa Hill filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendatio
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated December 26, 2012. [Docket No. 59] Plaintiff Melissa Hill filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated December 26, 2012. [Docket No. 59] Plaintiff Melissa Hill filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Boylan filed December 26, 2012.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Boylan dated December 26, 2012 [Docket No. 59].
2. Defendants The United States Federal Protective Service and FPS Inspector Jesse Rodriguez's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 36] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:
a. The motion to dismiss Count I claims against The United States Federal Protective Service and FPS Inspector Jesse Rodriguez for actions taken in an official capacity is GRANTED;
b. Defendant The United States Federal Protective Service is DISMISSED as a Defendant in this action; and
c. The motion to dismiss Count I individual claims against FPS Inspector Jesse Rodriguez on qualified immunity grounds is DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
