LANSING v. LPS FIELD SERVICES, INC., 13-655 (MJD/AJB). (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20130927h61
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated July 29, 2013. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated July 29, 2013. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate ..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated July 29, 2013. Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Boylan dated July 29, 2013.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated July 29, 2013 [Docket No. 21].
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 9] is GRANTED, and the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
