FAGEN, INC. v. EXERGY DEVELOPMENT GROUP OF IDAHO, LLC, 12-2703 (MJD/SER). (2013)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20131028906
Visitors: 1
Filed: Oct. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2013
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau filed September 11, 2013. Third-Party Defendant Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recomm
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau filed September 11, 2013. Third-Party Defendant Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recomme..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau filed September 11, 2013. Third-Party Defendant Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rau filed September 11, 2013.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau filed September 11, 2013 [Docket No. 58].
2. Third-Party Defendant Hawley Troxell Ennis & Hawley LLP's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 34] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
