ST. JUDE MEDICAL S.C., INC. v. TORMEY, 11-327 (MJD/TNL). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20140529f12
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 28, 2014
Latest Update: May 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for review of Clerk's Cost Judgment. [Doc. No. 255] The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Bill of Costs and all of the supporting documentation and has reviewed the Defendant's objections to such costs. Consistent with the Bill of Costs Guide of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1920, the Court finds that with respect to costs for photoc
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for review of Clerk's Cost Judgment. [Doc. No. 255] The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Bill of Costs and all of the supporting documentation and has reviewed the Defendant's objections to such costs. Consistent with the Bill of Costs Guide of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1920, the Court finds that with respect to costs for photoco..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for review of Clerk's Cost Judgment. [Doc. No. 255]
The Court has reviewed the Plaintiff's Bill of Costs and all of the supporting documentation and has reviewed the Defendant's objections to such costs. Consistent with the Bill of Costs Guide of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, the Court finds that with respect to costs for photocopies referenced in Plaintiff's Ex. 6, Component E101 in the amount of $1,094.40 [Doc. No. 245-6], Plaintiff has not provided sufficient documentation or description to demonstrate that these are costs that are taxable under § 1920. In addition, Plaintiff has failed to provide sufficient documentation or description to demonstrate that the costs associated with Night Owl Document Management Services referenced in Plaintiff's Ex. 7 in the amount of $714.58 [Doc. No. 245-7] are taxable under § 1920.
As to the remaining costs, the Court finds that Plaintiff has sufficiently demonstrated that these represent taxable costs.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Review of Clerk's Cost Judgment [Doc. No. 255] is GRANTED in part as follows: Plaintiff's costs in the amount of $10,498.37 shall be taxed against Defendant Thomas M. Tormey, Jr. and Counterclaim Plaintiff Tormedco, Inc. .
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
