HAALAND v. DONAHOE, 13-1876 (JNE/FLN). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20140812b55
Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. In a Report and Recommendation dated July 18, 2014, the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. Defendant did not object. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 44]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's motion to dismiss [Docket No. 16] is DENIE
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. In a Report and Recommendation dated July 18, 2014, the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. Defendant did not object. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 44]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Defendant's motion to dismiss [Docket No. 16] is DENIED..
More
ORDER
JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.
In a Report and Recommendation dated July 18, 2014, the Honorable Franklin L. Noel, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that Defendant's motion to dismiss be denied. Defendant did not object. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Docket No. 44]. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:
1. Defendant's motion to dismiss [Docket No. 16] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
