MYSER v. STATE, 14-2587 (DSD/HB). (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20141028g57
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 21, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge. The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. This action is DI
Summary: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge. The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED; 2. This action is DIS..
More
ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted.
Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED;
2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b)
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
