BB MOTOR SALES, LLC v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, 14-5093 (MJD/JJK). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20150707a48
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 06, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , Chief District Judge . The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, dated April 24, 2015. [Docket No. 29] Defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 30] Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , Chief District Judge . The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, dated April 24, 2015. [Docket No. 29] Defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 30] Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation o..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, dated April 24, 2015. [Docket No. 29] Defendant filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 30]
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Keyes dated April 24, 2015.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes, dated April 24, 2015 [Docket No. 29].
2. Defendant General Motors' Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 14] is DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART, as follows:
a. General Motors' motion to dismiss Count I (breach of the dealer agreement) is DENIED, and
b. General Motors' motion to dismiss Count II (violation of Minn. Stat. 80E. 13(h)) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
