U.S. v. VU, 09-172 (11)(MJD). (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20151210c03
Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's pro se motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Defendant seeks a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines which lowered the drug quantity base offense levels applicable to certain drug offenses. Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction, however, as she was sentenced to the ten year mandatory minimum sentence required under 21 U.S
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's pro se motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). Defendant seeks a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines which lowered the drug quantity base offense levels applicable to certain drug offenses. Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction, however, as she was sentenced to the ten year mandatory minimum sentence required under 21 U.S...
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's pro se motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).
Defendant seeks a sentence reduction based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines which lowered the drug quantity base offense levels applicable to certain drug offenses. Defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction, however, as she was sentenced to the ten year mandatory minimum sentence required under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(A) and Amendment 782 did not alter the applicable guideline range for cases involving a statutory minimum sentence.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motions for Sentence Reduction [Doc. Nos. 814 and 818] are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
