Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Evers, 15-114 (MJD/TNL). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20160318b10 Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . Based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Government's Motion in Limine to Preclude the Admission of Medical Records [Docket No. 84] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. If Defendant can show that Exhibit 2 was ordered by his treating physician to treat his back condition, the motion to exclude Exhibit 2 is denied. 2. If Defendant can show that Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 are related to his
More

ORDER

Based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

The Government's Motion in Limine to Preclude the Admission of Medical Records [Docket No. 84] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. If Defendant can show that Exhibit 2 was ordered by his treating physician to treat his back condition, the motion to exclude Exhibit 2 is denied. 2. If Defendant can show that Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 are related to his back injury, the motion to exclude Exhibits 3 and 4 is denied. 3. The motion to exclude Exhibit 6 is granted because under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, any probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of confusing and misleading the jury. Exhibit 6 is related to the time period after the alleged crimes, and it is focuses on Defendant's hip arthritis, which was not a basis for Defendant's worker's compensation benefits.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer