Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HUTAR v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, 15-2100 MJD/JJK. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20160517a99 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER ON CO-DEFENDANT MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated April 4, 2016. Defendant Wilcox Automotive, LLC ("Wilcox") objects to the Magistrate Judge's finding that the relevant Indemnity Agreement obligated Wilcox to indemnify Cross-Claimant Exeter Finance Corp. ("Exeter") against the causes of action alleged by Pla
More

ORDER ON CO-DEFENDANT MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

The above-entitled matter came before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey J. Keyes dated April 4, 2016. Defendant Wilcox Automotive, LLC ("Wilcox") objects to the Magistrate Judge's finding that the relevant Indemnity Agreement obligated Wilcox to indemnify Cross-Claimant Exeter Finance Corp. ("Exeter") against the causes of action alleged by Plaintiff against Exeter, and that Wilcox was obligated to pay Exeter attorney's fees in the amount of $7,145.50.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court will ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Cross-Claimant Exeter's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 83) is GRANTED, and Wilcox is hereby ordered to indemnify Exeter in the amount of $7,145.50 in attorney's fees; and 2. Cross-Defendant Wilcox's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Doc. No. 91) is DENIED.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer