Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Roskop, 16-mc-32 (PAM/HB). (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20160818h37 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 17, 2016
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2016
Summary: ORDER PAUL A. MAGNUSON , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the July 28, 2016, Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer (Docket No. 8). No objections have been filed in the time period permitted. The Court therefore adopts the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 8) is ADOPTED; 2. The United States of America's Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summonses (Docket No. 1) is GRAN
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the July 28, 2016, Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of Magistrate Judge Hildy Bowbeer (Docket No. 8). No objections have been filed in the time period permitted. The Court therefore adopts the R&R.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 8) is ADOPTED; 2. The United States of America's Petition to Enforce Internal Revenue Service Summonses (Docket No. 1) is GRANTED; 3. Respondent Mark Roskop shall fully comply with the summonses issued on May 15, 2015, attached as Exhibits A and B to the Declaration of Revenue Office Cynthia Vaughn, with the modification that the date range for the second summons (Vaughn Decl. Ex. B) is January 1, 2016, to the present; 4. The United States' request to recover its costs in maintaining this action is GRANTED; and 5. The United States, should it elect to pursue such costs, shall submit a bill of costs so that the Clerk of Court may make a proper determination of the amount of costs to be awarded.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer