BATISTA v. U.S., 16-794 (PJS/DTS). (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20170727c22
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 26, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2017
Summary: ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ , District Judge . The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated June 9, 2017 and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation dated June 29, 2107. No objections have been filed to those Reports and Recommendations in the time period permitted. The Court, being duly advised in the premises, upon the Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and upon all of the files, reco
Summary: ORDER PATRICK J. SCHILTZ , District Judge . The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated June 9, 2017 and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation dated June 29, 2107. No objections have been filed to those Reports and Recommendations in the time period permitted. The Court, being duly advised in the premises, upon the Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and upon all of the files, recor..
More
ORDER
PATRICK J. SCHILTZ, District Judge.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz dated June 9, 2017 and the Supplemental Report and Recommendation dated June 29, 2107. No objections have been filed to those Reports and Recommendations in the time period permitted.
The Court, being duly advised in the premises, upon the Reports and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and upon all of the files, records and proceedings herein, now makes and enters the following Order.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Defendants United States, Dunlop, Schumacher and Griffith's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 63) Batista's First Amended Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
a. The motion is GRANTED as to all claims against defendants Dunlop, Schumacher and Griffith, and such claims are DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of personal jurisdiction.
b. The motion to dismiss claims against the United States based on the IACA is DENIED.
c. The motion is GRANTED as to Batista's medical malpractice claims regarding conduct that occurred in Minnesota, and such claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to comply with Minn. Stat. §145.682.
d. The motion is GRANTED as to Batista's FTCA negligence claim against the United States that is based on Jensen's acts or omissions, and that such claim be DISMISSED.
2. Batista's request to transfer venue (ECF No. 86) is DENIED without prejudice.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
