Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USA v. Senty-Haugen, 17-cr-182 (JNE/LIB). (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20171222f31 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2017
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN , District Judge . In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated November 21, 2017, the Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Court deny Defendant's motion to suppress. ECF No. 42. The R&R also denied as moot both Defendant's motion for leave to file additional documents and the Government's motion to strike pro se filings. Id. Defendant objected to the R&R. ECF No. 43. The Government responded. ECF No. 44. Based on a de novo
More

ORDER

In a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated November 21, 2017, the Honorable Leo I. Brisbois, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the Court deny Defendant's motion to suppress. ECF No. 42. The R&R also denied as moot both Defendant's motion for leave to file additional documents and the Government's motion to strike pro se filings. Id. Defendant objected to the R&R. ECF No. 43. The Government responded. ECF No. 44. Based on a de novo review of the record, the Court accepts the conclusions of the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant's motion to suppress [ECF No. 24] is DENIED. 2. Defendant's motion for leave to file additional documents [ECF No. 37] is DENIED AS MOOT. 3. The Government's motion to strike pro se filings [ECF No. 38] is DENIED AS MOOT.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer