Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Alama, 16-78 (JRT). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20180416834 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY JOHN R. TUNHEIM , District Judge . Defendant Deanna Mae Alama has filed a Second Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Reply to Government's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence [Docket No. 59]. Alama requests an extension until May 30, 2018. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Alama's Motion is GRANTED. The reply to Government's Response is due on or before May 30, 2018.

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REPLY

Defendant Deanna Mae Alama has filed a Second Motion for Extension of Time to Submit Reply to Government's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence [Docket No. 59]. Alama requests an extension until May 30, 2018.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Alama's Motion is GRANTED. The reply to Government's Response is due on or before May 30, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer