Filed: Jul. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the May 23, 2018 Report and Recommendation (R&R) and the June 12, 2018 R&R of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Dkts. 120, 125.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&Rs for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59; United States v. Newton, 259 F.3d 964 , 966 (8th Cir. 2001); accord Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the May 23, 2018 Report and Recommendation (R&R) and the June 12, 2018 R&R of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Dkts. 120, 125.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&Rs for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59; United States v. Newton, 259 F.3d 964 , 966 (8th Cir. 2001); accord Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the May 23, 2018 Report and Recommendation (R&R) and the June 12, 2018 R&R of United States Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz. (Dkts. 120, 125.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the R&Rs for clear error. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59; United States v. Newton, 259 F.3d 964, 966 (8th Cir. 2001); accord Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the R&Rs, the Court finds no clear error.
Based on the R&Rs and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The May 23, 2018 R&R, (Dkt. 120), and the June 12, 2018 R&R, (Dkt. 125), are ADOPTED.
2. Defendant Hakeem Malik Dontae Flax's Motion to Sever Defendant, (Dkt. 81), is DENIED.
3. Flax's Motion to Suppress Statements, (Dkt. 82), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as outlined in the R&Rs.
4. Flax's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained Search and Seizure [sic], (Dkt. 83), is DENIED.
5. Flax's Motion to Suppress Cell Phone Evidence, (Dkt. 84), is DENIED.
