Leatherberry v. Titus, 18-1987(DSD/DTS). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20181009b56
Visitors: 25
Filed: Oct. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2018
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. DOTY , District Judge . This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz, dated September 13, 2018 (R&R). The magistrate judge recommended that the court deny petitioner Robert Earl Leatherberry's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. No objections to the R&R have been filed within the time period permitted. Under these circumstances, the court
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. DOTY , District Judge . This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz, dated September 13, 2018 (R&R). The magistrate judge recommended that the court deny petitioner Robert Earl Leatherberry's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. No objections to the R&R have been filed within the time period permitted. Under these circumstances, the court ..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge David T. Schultz, dated September 13, 2018 (R&R). The magistrate judge recommended that the court deny petitioner Robert Earl Leatherberry's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. No objections to the R&R have been filed within the time period permitted. Under these circumstances, the court finds it appropriate to adopt the R&R.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The R&R [ECF No. 5] is adopted in its entirety; and
2. Leatherberry's application for a writ of habeas corpus [ECF No. 1] is denied without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
