Jenkins v. Barnes, 18-cv-1425 (WMW/ECW). (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20181102f99
Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the October 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Dkt. 6.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793 , 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court find
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the October 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Dkt. 6.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793 , 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
WILHELMINA M. WRIGHT, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the October 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright. (Dkt. 6.) Because no objections have been filed, this Court reviews the Report and Recommendation for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds no clear error.1
Based on the Report and Recommendation and all the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The October 1, 2018 Report and Recommendation, (Dkt. 6), is ADOPTED; and
2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
FootNotes
1. The Court is mindful that Jenkins challenges the application of United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2K2.1(c)(1)(B), not § 2K1.1(c)(1)(B). The Report and Recommendation's substantive review and analysis, however, is legally sound.
Source: Leagle
