Kennedy-Bey v. Ellison, 16-3938 (DWF/KMM). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20190125c79
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 24, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 24, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK , District Judge . The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez dated October 29, 2019. (Doc. No. 32.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference.
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DONOVAN W. FRANK , District Judge . The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez dated October 29, 2019. (Doc. No. 32.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. ..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.
The above matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez dated October 29, 2019. (Doc. No. 32.) No objections have been filed to that Report and Recommendation in the time period permitted. The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference. Based upon the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and upon all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, the Court now makes and enters the following:
ORDER
1. Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez's October 29, 2019 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [32]) is ADOPTED.
2. The State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. [9]) is GRANTED.
3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on the grounds of collateral estoppel.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
Source: Leagle
