U.S. v. Hasse, CR 18-255(2) (MJD/LIB). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20190214d69
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 13, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon the Defendant's motion [Docket No. 53] to exclude the period of time from the date of this order through February 27, 2019 from the Speedy Trial Act computations in this case. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial.
Summary: ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon the Defendant's motion [Docket No. 53] to exclude the period of time from the date of this order through February 27, 2019 from the Speedy Trial Act computations in this case. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial. ..
More
ORDER TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon the Defendant's motion [Docket No. 53] to exclude the period of time from the date of this order through February 27, 2019 from the Speedy Trial Act computations in this case. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting such a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial. This finding is based on the facts set forth in the Statement of Facts in Support of Motion to Exclude Time Under the Speedy Trial Act.
IT IS ORDERED that the period from the date of this order through February 27, 2019 shall be excluded from the Speedy Trial Act Computations in this case.
Source: Leagle
