Rossi v. St. Paul Post Office, 18-CV-3057 (DWF/DTS). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20190215a77
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2019
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID T. SCHULTZ , Magistrate Judge . On Tuesday, January 22, 2019, the Court held a hearing on Defendant St. Paul Post Office's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff Michael Rossi did not appear, nor has he otherwise responded to the motion. Accordingly, the Court recommends dismissal of the matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court recommends that: 1. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJU
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID T. SCHULTZ , Magistrate Judge . On Tuesday, January 22, 2019, the Court held a hearing on Defendant St. Paul Post Office's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff Michael Rossi did not appear, nor has he otherwise responded to the motion. Accordingly, the Court recommends dismissal of the matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court recommends that: 1. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUD..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DAVID T. SCHULTZ, Magistrate Judge.
On Tuesday, January 22, 2019, the Court held a hearing on Defendant St. Paul Post Office's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Plaintiff Michael Rossi did not appear, nor has he otherwise responded to the motion. Accordingly, the Court recommends dismissal of the matter without prejudice for failure to prosecute.
For the reasons stated on the record, the Court recommends that:
1. This action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b);
2. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction [Docket No. 4] be DENIED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
