Patterson v. Casalenda, 18-CV-2081 (NEB/SER). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20190529e74
Visitors: 2
Filed: May 28, 2019
Latest Update: May 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NANCY E. BRASEL , District Judge . The Court has received the April 23, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. [ECF No. 56 ("R&R").] No party has objected to that R&R, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793 , 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-c
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION NANCY E. BRASEL , District Judge . The Court has received the April 23, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. [ECF No. 56 ("R&R").] No party has objected to that R&R, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793 , 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-ca..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
NANCY E. BRASEL, District Judge.
The Court has received the April 23, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. [ECF No. 56 ("R&R").] No party has objected to that R&R, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
1. The Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 56] is ACCEPTED;
2. Defendants Reishus and Hills' Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 13] is DENIED as moot;
3. Plaintiff's Motion for Order for Protection [and] Order to Show Cause for Protection [ECF No. 30] is DENIED;
4. Defendants Casalenda, Costello, and Zacharias's Motion to Summary Judgment [ECF No. 42] is GRANTED;
5. Defendants Casalenda, Costello, and Zacharias's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [ECF No. 48] is DENIED; and
6. This matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff originally sued Defendants Jason Hill and David Reishus. (R&R at 1 n.1.) However, all claims against them have been dismissed pursuant to the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 32] and the Court's order [ECF No. 37] dismissing those claims. In his amended complaint, Plaintiff also sued Defendants Derek Magel, Irene Tuschner, John Ricci, and James Frick. [ECF No. 41.] Judge Rau recommends dismissing Plaintiff's allegations against these new defendants in the same manner and for the same reasons as he recommends dismissing the allegations against named Defendants Casalenda, Costello, and Zacharias.
Source: Leagle
