Jim Lupient Company v. Nissan North America, Inc., 18-cv-3474 (MJD/TNL). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20190801b45
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 31, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated June 28, 2019 [Doc. No. 46] recommending that Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's defenses be denied. No objections have been filed within the time permitted. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court will ADOPT th
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated June 28, 2019 [Doc. No. 46] recommending that Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's defenses be denied. No objections have been filed within the time permitted. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court will ADOPT the..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated June 28, 2019 [Doc. No. 46] recommending that Plaintiff's motion to strike Defendant's defenses be denied. No objections have been filed within the time permitted.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court will ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in its entirety.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Defenses [Doc. No. 26] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
