Plymouth County Retirement System v. Patterson Companies, Inc., 18-871 (MJD/SER). (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20190911c94
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated July 25, 2019. Defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Cour
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS , District Judge . The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated July 25, 2019. Defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated July 25, 2019. Defendants filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections were made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rau dated July 25, 2019, with the modification that, on page 23 of the Report and Recommendation, the amount "$39.92" is amended to read "$32.92."
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated July 25, 2019 [Docket No. 112] with the modification set forth in this Order.
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Class Action Complaint [Docket No. 89] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in the Report and Recommendation.
Source: Leagle
