MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Government's request for an Amended Judgment to Include Specified Restitution. (Doc. Nos. 89 and 97.) Defendant has not responded to this request despite two Orders directing he respond. (Doc. Nos. 91 and 94.) Copies of the orders were mailed to Defendant.
On February 2, 2017, Defendant was sentenced to 82 months imprisonment on Counts 1 and 9 of the Indictment which charged mail fraud and transactional money laundering, to be served concurrently. The Court ordered that restitution was mandatory, and that the amount was to be determined. (Doc. No. 68 (Sent. Tr. at 18-19).) Initially, the Government was given 120 days to submit to the Court the pertinent amount of restitution. (
On September 26, 2019, the Government filed a motion to amend the judgment to include specified restitution as the bankruptcy proceedings are substantially complete. The Government moves to amend the judgment to include an Order of Restitution in the total amount of $820,960.55, payable as set forth in the supplement to the motion to amend and offset as to payments made to victims from the Omni Construction Services, Inc. bankruptcy proceedings. (Doc. Nos. 89 and 97.)
Under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act ("MVRA"), "the court shall order, in addition to . . . any other penalty authorized by law, that the defendant make restitution to the victim of the offense." 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(a)(1). It is undisputed that the MVRA applies in this case. (
The Court holds that it has jurisdiction to enter this restitution order more than 90 days after sentencing.
To establish the amounts that have been paid to certain victims through the Omni Construction bankruptcy, the Government has submitted a copy of the Chapter 7 Trustee's Final Account and Distribution Report Certification that the Estate has been Fully Administered and Application to be Discharged. (Doc. No. 89 (Ex. A to Government Motion).) The Government asserts it will provide supplemental documentation to the Clerk of Court if it determines that additional bankruptcy payments were made to subcontractors associated with the projects set forth in its motion.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein,