ARIF v. SHKUR, 318 S.W.3d 233 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco101206001303
Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 22, 2010
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2010
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM: Amanj Arif appeals from the trial court's judgment of dissolution of marriage and contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $854 per month in child support. After a thorough review of the record, we find there was sufficient evidence to support the award, it was not against the clear weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the part
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM: Amanj Arif appeals from the trial court's judgment of dissolution of marriage and contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $854 per month in child support. After a thorough review of the record, we find there was sufficient evidence to support the award, it was not against the clear weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parti..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
Amanj Arif appeals from the trial court's judgment of dissolution of marriage and contends that the trial court erred in ordering him to pay $854 per month in child support. After a thorough review of the record, we find there was sufficient evidence to support the award, it was not against the clear weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
