WETZLER v. BARNES-JEWISH HOSPITAL, 321 S.W.3d 447 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco110121000247
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 26, 2010
Latest Update: Oct. 26, 2010
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Glenn Wetzler ("Wetzler") appeals the trial court's decision granting Regeneration Technologies, Inc. ("RTI"), Medtronic, Inc. ("Medtronic"), and Barnes Jewish Hospital's ("collectively Respondents") Motion for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, sett
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Glenn Wetzler ("Wetzler") appeals the trial court's decision granting Regeneration Technologies, Inc. ("RTI"), Medtronic, Inc. ("Medtronic"), and Barnes Jewish Hospital's ("collectively Respondents") Motion for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setti..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Glenn Wetzler ("Wetzler") appeals the trial court's decision granting Regeneration Technologies, Inc. ("RTI"), Medtronic, Inc. ("Medtronic"), and Barnes Jewish Hospital's ("collectively Respondents") Motion for Summary Judgment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
