FIRST STUDENT, INC. v. COLEMAN, 324 S.W.3d 776 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco110216000124
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2010
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals from a judgment setting aside a default judgment she had obtained against plaintiff. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals from a judgment setting aside a default judgment she had obtained against plaintiff. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their ..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals from a judgment setting aside a default judgment she had obtained against plaintiff. The judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976).
An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
