SEYER v. SIEVERS, 324 S.W.3d 493 (2010)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco110303000341
Visitors: 11
Filed: Nov. 09, 2010
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2010
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Brian Sievers, et al. appeals the trial court's decision that Matthew Seyer was entitled to a statutory way of necessity. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. We find the ruling in Hill v. Kennoy, Inc., 522 S.W.2d 775 (Mo. banc 1975) to be dispositive. An opinion would have no precedential value. The trial court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Brian Sievers, et al. appeals the trial court's decision that Matthew Seyer was entitled to a statutory way of necessity. We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal and find no error. We find the ruling in Hill v. Kennoy, Inc., 522 S.W.2d 775 (Mo. banc 1975) to be dispositive.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The trial court's judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
