AMPLEMAN v. TURNER, 341 S.W.3d 161 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco111028000127
Visitors: 1
Filed: Apr. 26, 2011
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2011
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. John Ampleman (Appellant) appeals, pro se, from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting summary judgment in favor St. Charles County Police Officer Christopher Kegley. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that Officer Kegley was entitled to qualified immunity. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Officer Kegley. An ext
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. John Ampleman (Appellant) appeals, pro se, from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting summary judgment in favor St. Charles County Police Officer Christopher Kegley. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that Officer Kegley was entitled to qualified immunity. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Officer Kegley. An exte..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
John Ampleman (Appellant) appeals, pro se, from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting summary judgment in favor St. Charles County Police Officer Christopher Kegley. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in determining that Officer Kegley was entitled to qualified immunity.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment in favor of Officer Kegley. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
