HEWGLEY v. HEWGLEY, 353 S.W.3d 680 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco120313000423
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 22, 2011
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2011
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Ronda Hewgley (Wife) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting Nelson Hewgley's (Husband) Motion to Modify maintenance. Wife claims that the court erred in reducing her maintenance because Husband failed to prove that a substantial and continuing change in circumstances rendered the prior award unreasonable. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous.
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Ronda Hewgley (Wife) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting Nelson Hewgley's (Husband) Motion to Modify maintenance. Wife claims that the court erred in reducing her maintenance because Husband failed to prove that a substantial and continuing change in circumstances rendered the prior award unreasonable. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. A..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Ronda Hewgley (Wife) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County granting Nelson Hewgley's (Husband) Motion to Modify maintenance. Wife claims that the court erred in reducing her maintenance because Husband failed to prove that a substantial and continuing change in circumstances rendered the prior award unreasonable.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
