WATKINS v. STATE, 347 S.W.3d 569 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inmoco20110629654
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 04, 2011
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2011
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Movant, Jamie Watkins, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information o
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Movant, Jamie Watkins, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information on..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Movant, Jamie Watkins, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
