KNIGSLAND INVEST. v. STATE FARM FIRE & CAS., 368 S.W.3d 243 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco121003000571
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jul. 03, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2012
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. The defendant, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company ("State Farm"), appeals from the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Kingsland Investments, L.P. ("Kingsland"), in Kingsland's action for equitable garnishment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been fur
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. The defendant, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company ("State Farm"), appeals from the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Kingsland Investments, L.P. ("Kingsland"), in Kingsland's action for equitable garnishment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furn..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The defendant, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company ("State Farm"), appeals from the summary judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County against it and in favor of the plaintiff, Kingsland Investments, L.P. ("Kingsland"), in Kingsland's action for equitable garnishment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
