NELSON v. NORDSTROM, INC., 382 S.W.3d 192 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco130214000403
Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 04, 2012
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2012
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Fredrick Nelson ("Claimant") appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits because Claimant failed to participate in the scheduled hearing before the appeals tribunal. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the dismissal of Claimant's appeal. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reas
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Fredrick Nelson ("Claimant") appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits because Claimant failed to participate in the scheduled hearing before the appeals tribunal. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the dismissal of Claimant's appeal. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reaso..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Fredrick Nelson ("Claimant") appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the dismissal of his claim for unemployment benefits because Claimant failed to participate in the scheduled hearing before the appeals tribunal. We find the Commission did not err in affirming the dismissal of Claimant's appeal. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
