STATE v. DAVIS, 397 S.W.3d 487 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco130906000104
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 28, 2013
Latest Update: May 28, 2013
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM: James Davis ("Davis") appeals from the trial court's judgment that denied his motion to withdraw a guilty plea pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). Davis argues that the trial court abused its discretion because he suffered manifest injustice in that his defense was prejudicially affected by his trial counsel's conflict of interest. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
ORDER
PER CURIAM:
James Davis ("Davis") appeals from the trial court's judgment that denied his motion to withdraw a guilty plea pursuant to Rule 29.07(d). Davis argues that the trial court abused its discretion because he suffered manifest injustice in that his defense was prejudicially affected by his trial counsel's conflict of interest. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
Source: Leagle
