PARKER v. STATE, 400 S.W.3d 846 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco131216000173
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2013
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Jason Parker appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to th
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Jason Parker appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035. 1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Jason Parker appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 24.035.1 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
FootNotes
1. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011.
Source: Leagle
