Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WOLFF v. GREEN, 401 S.W.3d 579 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri Number: inadvmoco131216000269 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 18, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2013
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Appellants Harold and Cindy Wolff appeal the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Respondents Ashwood Apartments, LP, and Baumann Property Company, Inc., on Appellants' claim of negligence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants Harold and Cindy Wolff appeal the trial court's summary judgment in favor of Respondents Ashwood Apartments, LP, and Baumann Property Company, Inc., on Appellants' claim of negligence. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer