GARDNER v. ALEXIAN BROTHERS, 411 S.W.3d 323 (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco140805000317
Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2013
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Eronne Gardner ("Claimant") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying her employment benefits. In her two points on appeal, Claimant contends that the Commission erred in finding that she voluntarily quit her employment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a m
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. Eronne Gardner ("Claimant") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying her employment benefits. In her two points on appeal, Claimant contends that the Commission erred in finding that she voluntarily quit her employment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a me..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Eronne Gardner ("Claimant") appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission ("Commission") denying her employment benefits. In her two points on appeal, Claimant contends that the Commission erred in finding that she voluntarily quit her employment.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.
We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
