R.H.H. v. N.L.S., 434 S.W.3d 114 (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals of Missouri
Number: inadvmoco141113000492
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2014
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. N.L.S. appeals from the court's Judgment of the Full Order of Child Protection (Full Order of Child Protection) temporarily awarding custody of T.N.H. and C.L.H. to R.H.H. and prohibiting N.L.S. from engaging in certain conduct for the duration of the Full Order of Child Protection. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion woul
Summary: ORDER PER CURIAM. N.L.S. appeals from the court's Judgment of the Full Order of Child Protection (Full Order of Child Protection) temporarily awarding custody of T.N.H. and C.L.H. to R.H.H. and prohibiting N.L.S. from engaging in certain conduct for the duration of the Full Order of Child Protection. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would..
More
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
N.L.S. appeals from the court's Judgment of the Full Order of Child Protection (Full Order of Child Protection) temporarily awarding custody of T.N.H. and C.L.H. to R.H.H. and prohibiting N.L.S. from engaging in certain conduct for the duration of the Full Order of Child Protection. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Source: Leagle
