Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MOORE v. FAMILY DOLLAR STORES, INC., 4:14-CV-1542-JAR. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri Number: infdco20141114b08 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Defendant Family Dollar Stores, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to Depose Plaintiff on the Limited Issue of Recently Destroyed Evidence. (Doc. No. 13) The motion is fully briefed and ready for disposition. Plaintiff Reginald Moore ("Moore") brings this putative class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. 227 ("TCPA"), alleging that Defendant Family Dollar Stores, Inc. ("Family Dollar") sen
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Family Dollar Stores, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to Depose Plaintiff on the Limited Issue of Recently Destroyed Evidence. (Doc. No. 13) The motion is fully briefed and ready for disposition.

Plaintiff Reginald Moore ("Moore") brings this putative class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 ("TCPA"), alleging that Defendant Family Dollar Stores, Inc. ("Family Dollar") sent him unsolicited text messages without his prior express written consent. Family Dollar seeks leave to take Moore's deposition to inquire about the circumstances surrounding the recent loss/destruction of his cell phone and determine what steps, if any, can be taken to mitigate the effects of lost evidence. At this point there appears to be no urgency for taking Moore's deposition prior to the parties conferring as required by Rule 26(f). While Family Dollar suggests that Moore's immediate deposition is necessary "to potentially recover information that has been lost or destroyed," Family Dollar does not explain how such a deposition would serve to "recover" any such information. Family Dollar may examine Moore on the loss of his cell phone when he is presented for deposition following the Rule 26(f) meet-and-confer session.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Family Dollar Stores, Inc.'s Motion for Leave to Depose Plaintiff on the Limited Issue of Recently Destroyed Evidence [13] is DENIED.

A separate Order setting this matter for a Rule 16 scheduling conference will accompany this Memorandum and Order.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer