DYSART v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, 4:15CV01221 ERW. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20151019932
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND E. RICHARD WEBBER , Senior District Judge . This motion comes before the court on Plaintiffs' motion to remand. [ECF No. 48] Persuaded by the well-reasoned and thorough order of the Honorable Catherine E. Perry in Farrar v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., 4:15-cv-01219, this Court agrees Plaintiffs' motion to remand in this case should be and will be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for remand [ECF No. 48] is granted, and thi
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND E. RICHARD WEBBER , Senior District Judge . This motion comes before the court on Plaintiffs' motion to remand. [ECF No. 48] Persuaded by the well-reasoned and thorough order of the Honorable Catherine E. Perry in Farrar v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., 4:15-cv-01219, this Court agrees Plaintiffs' motion to remand in this case should be and will be granted. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for remand [ECF No. 48] is granted, and this..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER OF REMAND
E. RICHARD WEBBER, Senior District Judge.
This motion comes before the court on Plaintiffs' motion to remand. [ECF No. 48] Persuaded by the well-reasoned and thorough order of the Honorable Catherine E. Perry in Farrar v. Johnson & Johnson, et al., 4:15-cv-01219, this Court agrees Plaintiffs' motion to remand in this case should be and will be granted.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motion for remand [ECF No. 48] is granted, and this case is remanded to the 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Missouri.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied without prejudice to being refiled in state court.
Source: Leagle
