Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Turner v. U.S., 1:15CV241 JAR. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri Number: infdco20160415b48 Visitors: 11
Filed: Apr. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Derrick Lamont Turner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. The motion is denied. Movant pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms of concaine. See United States v. Turner, 1:11CR103 JAR (E.D. Mo.). On June 29, 2012, the Court sentenced him to 192 months' imprisonment. His sentence was enhanced under Section 4B1.1 of the United
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Derrick Lamont Turner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motion is denied.

Movant pled guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute five kilograms of concaine. See United States v. Turner, 1:11CR103 JAR (E.D. Mo.). On June 29, 2012, the Court sentenced him to 192 months' imprisonment. His sentence was enhanced under Section 4B1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines because he had at least two prior drug felonies that qualified him for Career Offender status.

Movant seeks to reduce his sentence pursuant to Johnson v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 2551 (2015). In Johnson, the Court held that imposing an increased sentence under the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA) violates the Constitution's guarantee of due process. Id. at 2557. Because he was not sentenced as an Armed Career Criminal, the holding in Johnson does not entitle him to relief. Moreover, he had two prior felony controlled substance convictions. As a result, the motion is denied.

Finally, movant has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, which requires a demonstration "that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right." Khaimov v. Crist, 297 F.3d 783, 785 (8th Cir. 2002) (quotation omitted). Thus, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability.

An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer