USA v. Johnson, 4:17CR145 HEA. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20171211a59
Visitors: 27
Filed: Dec. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2017
Summary: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HENRY EDWARD AUTREY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins, addressing Defendant's Motion to Suppress, [Doc. No. 24]. On August 29, 2017, an evidentiary hearing was held. In her October 12, 2017 Report and Recommendation, Judge Collins recommended that the Defendant's motion be denied. Defendant has not filed written objections to this recommendation. The Court adopts Judge Coll
Summary: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HENRY EDWARD AUTREY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins, addressing Defendant's Motion to Suppress, [Doc. No. 24]. On August 29, 2017, an evidentiary hearing was held. In her October 12, 2017 Report and Recommendation, Judge Collins recommended that the Defendant's motion be denied. Defendant has not filed written objections to this recommendation. The Court adopts Judge Colli..
More
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HENRY EDWARD AUTREY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Noelle C. Collins, addressing Defendant's Motion to Suppress, [Doc. No. 24]. On August 29, 2017, an evidentiary hearing was held. In her October 12, 2017 Report and Recommendation, Judge Collins recommended that the Defendant's motion be denied. Defendant has not filed written objections to this recommendation. The Court adopts Judge Collin's recommendation.
Judge Collins' conclusion that there is no basis to suppress evidence is based on a thorough and sound legal analysis. The Court agrees with her conclusions in their entirety. The Recommendation is adopted in toto.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress, [Doc. No. 24], is denied.
Source: Leagle