Norwood-Redfield Apartments Limited Partnership v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company, 4:16-cv-00639-AGF. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20180621c62
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG , District Judge . Upon careful consideration of Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Attorneys' Fees Testimony Offered by Plaintiff (ECF 72), Plaintiff's response thereto (ECF No. 77), the parties' supplemental briefs (ECF Nos. 95 & 99), and the legal authorities cited therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Attorneys' Fees Testimony Offered by Plaintiff is DENIED in part without prejudice to reassertion after Plain
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER AUDREY G. FLEISSIG , District Judge . Upon careful consideration of Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Attorneys' Fees Testimony Offered by Plaintiff (ECF 72), Plaintiff's response thereto (ECF No. 77), the parties' supplemental briefs (ECF Nos. 95 & 99), and the legal authorities cited therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Attorneys' Fees Testimony Offered by Plaintiff is DENIED in part without prejudice to reassertion after Plaint..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
AUDREY G. FLEISSIG, District Judge.
Upon careful consideration of Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Attorneys' Fees Testimony Offered by Plaintiff (ECF 72), Plaintiff's response thereto (ECF No. 77), the parties' supplemental briefs (ECF Nos. 95 & 99), and the legal authorities cited therein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion in Limine to Bar Attorneys' Fees Testimony Offered by Plaintiff is DENIED in part without prejudice to reassertion after Plaintiff's evidence on this issue is admitted; however, RULING IS RESERVED as to any opinion testimony offered by Plaintiff on the issue of attorneys' fees, pending Plaintiff's demonstration, prior to trial, that such testimony was sufficiently disclosed during discovery.
Source: Leagle
