SBFO Operator No. 3, LLC v. Onex Corporation, 4:19-cv-03271-JAR. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20200212885
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 11, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS , District Judge . Currently before the Court is a Motion for Clarification filed by Defendants Onex Corporation and Onex Partners IV, LP. (Doc. 22.) Those defendants represent that Plaintiffs' counsel stated to them that their corporate disclosure statements did not comply with Local Rule 2.09. (Doc. 22 at 2.) However, no objection or issue has been raised before this Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall, within seven (7) d
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOHN A. ROSS , District Judge . Currently before the Court is a Motion for Clarification filed by Defendants Onex Corporation and Onex Partners IV, LP. (Doc. 22.) Those defendants represent that Plaintiffs' counsel stated to them that their corporate disclosure statements did not comply with Local Rule 2.09. (Doc. 22 at 2.) However, no objection or issue has been raised before this Court. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall, within seven (7) da..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOHN A. ROSS, District Judge.
Currently before the Court is a Motion for Clarification filed by Defendants Onex Corporation and Onex Partners IV, LP. (Doc. 22.) Those defendants represent that Plaintiffs' counsel stated to them that their corporate disclosure statements did not comply with Local Rule 2.09. (Doc. 22 at ¶ 2.) However, no objection or issue has been raised before this Court. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall, within seven (7) days of the date of this order, file a memorandum stating whether and why they believe the corporate disclosure statement filed by Onex Corporation and Onex Partners IV, LP. do not comply with the local rule, including any supporting case law.
Source: Leagle
