Young v. Hoogland Foods, LLC, 4:19 CV 456 CDP. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20200224976
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on pro se plaintiff William Young's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's order granting defendant Hoogland Foods' Motion to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff alleges he has "new evidence" to support his claims that he did not sign an arbitration agreement and that his electronic signature was forged. However, because plaintiff has not actually presented any alleged evidence to support his unsworn al
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CATHERINE D. PERRY , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on pro se plaintiff William Young's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's order granting defendant Hoogland Foods' Motion to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff alleges he has "new evidence" to support his claims that he did not sign an arbitration agreement and that his electronic signature was forged. However, because plaintiff has not actually presented any alleged evidence to support his unsworn all..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CATHERINE D. PERRY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on pro se plaintiff William Young's Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's order granting defendant Hoogland Foods' Motion to Compel Arbitration. Plaintiff alleges he has "new evidence" to support his claims that he did not sign an arbitration agreement and that his electronic signature was forged. However, because plaintiff has not actually presented any alleged evidence to support his unsworn allegations, nor "set forth any manifest error of law or fact" in my Order compelling arbitration, I will deny plaintiff's motion. See Meeks v. United Auto., Aerospace of Agr. Implement Workers of Am., No. 4:05CV1779 HEA, 2007 WL 1395461, at *1 (E.D. Mo. May 9, 2007).
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff William Young's Motion for Reconsideration [ECF 26] is DENIED.
Source: Leagle
