Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Smith v. Payne, 4:19CV1913SNLJ. (2020)

Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri Number: infdco20200305c90 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff, pro se, has filed a petition for habeas corpus with this Court. He has filed two motions, both titled "Petition for Writ of Mandamus" (#9, #15). Generally, plaintiff states that he is unable to get copies of motions, comply with Court rules, or access the law library (#15), and is unable to listen to or mail to this Court compact discs that apparently contain witness statements or other evidence (#9). Respondent
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiff, pro se, has filed a petition for habeas corpus with this Court. He has filed two motions, both titled "Petition for Writ of Mandamus" (#9, #15).

Generally, plaintiff states that he is unable to get copies of motions, comply with Court rules, or access the law library (#15), and is unable to listen to or mail to this Court compact discs that apparently contain witness statements or other evidence (#9).

Respondent has not responded to these motions. The Court will grant the motions in part by ordering respondent to file a memorandum responding to these petitions.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motions for writs of mandamus (#9, #15) are GRANTED in part.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer