ARTHUR B. FEDERMAN, Bankruptcy Judge.
The Chapter 13 Trustee filed a Motion to Deny Confirmation of Debtor Karen L. Clark's proposed Chapter 13 plan because, he asserts, the Debtor is above-median and must propose a sixty-month plan. For the reasons that follow, the Motion to Deny Confirmation will be GRANTED.
The Debtor and her non-filing spouse have income from four sources: social security, pensions, self-employment, and residential rental income. At issue here is the rental income, and how it fits into the calculation of "current monthly income" for purposes of determining the "applicable commitment period" of the Debtor's Chapter 13 plan.
The Debtor asserts she is below the relevant median family income and is proposing a three-year plan; the Trustee asserts she is above-median and must propose a five-year plan. Whether the Debtor is above-median or below-median turns on whether she should use gross or net rental income in calculating her "current monthly income."
Current monthly income ("CMI") is defined, in relevant part, as the "average monthly income from all sources the debtor receives . . . without regard to whether such income is taxable income, derived during the six month period" before the date specified in § 101(10A)(A)(i) and (ii).
In In re Wano, the Honorable Jerry W. Venters of this district held that, since § 1325(b)(2)(B) requires that self-employed debtors take deductions for business expenses in determining disposable income, the business's gross income should be used for calculating CMI.
The Debtor asserts, however, that expenses incurred in connection with rental real estate income — particularly, mortgage payments — are distinguishable from self-employment business expenses and should be deducted above the line in calculating CMI. As with business income, Official Form 122C-1 directs debtors to use net rental income in calculating CMI. And, as the Debtor points out, the courts holding that business expenses must be taken below the line, despite the official form, point to the fact that § 1325(b)(2)(B) expressly provides that "business" deductions be taken from CMI in calculating disposable income. The statute does not specifically refer to rental income and expenses, however, so the Debtor asserts there is no conflict between the statute and the form. Therefore, she asserts, the form should be followed as it relates to rental income. Moreover, the Debtor asserts that public policy supports using net income in calculating CMI because that more accurately reflects the reality of her situation.
As a practical matter, however, I see no difference between earning income as a landlord than from any other kind of self-employment "business." Nor are mortgage payments any different than the other kinds of expenses incurred in a business operation. Similarly, for wage-earners, Form 122C-1 uses gross wages, salary, tips, bonuses, overtime, and commissions in calculating CMI. Some courts have acknowledged that using net business income in calculating CMI would make sense, but the statute controls, and public policy supports a bright-line rule in the application of the statute. Therefore, regardless of what kind of income the debtor has, and regardless of the official form, gross income should be used in calculating CMI and the applicable commitment period. Expenses are then deducted in calculating disposable income and, thus, the plan payment amount.
ACCORDINGLY, because the Debtor is above-median, her applicable commitment period is sixty months. The Trustee's Motion to Deny Confirmation of her Chapter 13 Plan is, therefore, GRANTED. The Debtor is directed to file an amended plan within 21 days, or her case will be dismissed.
IT IS SO ORDERED.